Dendrocronología aplicada para fijación de carbono en plantaciones de teca (Tectona grandis) en el Fundo La Génova, Junín - Perú
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabajo tuvo como fin determinar cantidad de carbono asimilado en arboles de la especie Tectona grandis mediante el analisis densitometrico. La muestra consistio en cinco discos extraidos de cinco individuos de esta especie procedentes del Fundo La Genova (Chanchamayo). Estos discos fueron utilizados para hallar las areas pertenecientes a sus anillos y se prepararon muestras para realizar un ensayo de densitometria de rayos X. La biomasa de carbono fue hallada relacionando el area del anillo con los valores de densidad obtenidos. Como conclusion se determino la efectividad del metodo utilizado para la determinacion de la biomasa de carbono en los anillos de crecimiento para la especie Tectona grandis. A su vez, se pudo observar una diferencia significativa de carbono secuestrado entre los 5 arboles evaluados. Se encontraron menores concentraciones de carbono en los anillos pertenecientes a la fase juvenil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it