MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3089064542 · doi:10.1177/1756286420954083

Standardized algorithm for muscle selection and dosing of botulinum toxin for Parkinson tremor using kinematic analysis

2020· article· en· W3089064542 on OpenAlexaff
Olivia Samotus, Mandar Jog

Bibliographic record

VenueTherapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
FundersMerz Pharmaceuticals
KeywordsMedicineDosingBotulinum toxinRating scalePhysical medicine and rehabilitationEssential tremorQuality of life (healthcare)Grip strengthWeaknessPhysical therapyAnesthesiaInternal medicinePsychologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Inadequate efficacy and significant side effect profile makes pharmacological treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) tremor challenging. Personalized dosing of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) using tremor analysis has shown efficacy and safety for treating upper limb tremor. This study incorporated a novel, standardized treatment algorithm for determining injection pattern and BoNT-A dosing, customizable by the physician, in PD patients with disabling tremor in one or both arms. METHODS: This open-label study included 47 PD participants (25 "De-novo" and 22 "L-dopa") who received 4 serial BoNT-A treatments with follow-ups at 6 weeks post-treatment over 42 weeks. The treatment algorithm utilized kinematic tremor analysis of each participant's whole arm tremor and determined the physician's injection pattern of BoNT-A. Endpoints included changes in angular tremor amplitude, Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM C) tremor scale, Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS) tremor-related score, tremor-related quality of life questionnaire, Likert ratings of perceived weakness, and maximal grip strength. RESULTS: < 0.05) improved tremor amplitude (41.6%), quality of life (23.0%), UPDRS tremor score (29.6%), and arm function (FTM C; 24.6%) for both treatment cohorts from weeks 6 to 42. Maximum grip strength was reduced between 7.4% and 23.0% at follow-up visits and did not impact activities of daily living. Efficacy was obtained with first injection and remained without adjustment over two serial injection in 45% of participants. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to use a fully standardized treatment algorithm for personalization of BoNT-A injection patterns for disabling PD tremor over serial treatments. A sustained alleviation of tremor severity and improved arm function and quality of life fulfills an important unmet need for the treatment of PD tremor. This study demonstrated that BoNT-A can be administered as a monotherapy in tremor-dominant PD or as an add-on therapy for refractory PD tremor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTherapeutic Advances in Neurological DisordersSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207