George Turnbull and Art History at Scottish Universities in the Eighteenth Century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article met en lumière les effets du concept d’importance pédagogique de l’histoire de l’art formulée par George Turnbull, représentant de la philosophie morale en Écosse au Siècle des Lumières. Nous soutenons que les idées de son Treatise on Ancient Painting (1740) ont été mises en pratique et intégrées dans les universités écossaises dès le milieu du XVIIIe siècle. Après une comparaison entre les écrits de Turnbull et ceux de la théorie de l’art britannique plus ancienne, donc plus traditionelle, seront examinées les fonctions premières de la discipline à l’université de Glasgow, plus précisément celles énoncées dans le programme d’histoire, puis à l’Académie des Beaux-Arts de la même ville. Cette analyse montrera qu’en Écosse l’histoire de l’art s’est institutionnalisée beaucoup plus rapidement qu’en Angleterre, la première chaire datant de 1879.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".