MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3089168149 · doi:10.1159/000511811

Vertebral Fractures Associated with Spinal Sagittal Imbalance and Quality of Life in Acromegaly: A Radiographic Study with EOS 2D/3D Technology

2020· article· en· W3089168149 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Miriam Cellini, Emilia Biamonte, Massimiliano Mazza, Nicoletta Trenti, Pasquala Ragucci, Davide Milani, Emanuele Ferrante, Zefferino Rossini, Elisabetta Lavezzi, Elisa Sala, Giovanna Mantovani, Maura Arosio, Maurizio Fornari, Luca Balzarini, Andrea Lania, Gherardo Mazziotti

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroendocrinology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAcromegalyPelvic tiltSagittal planeArthropathyRadiographyQuality of life (healthcare)Cobb angleSurgeryInternal medicineOsteoarthritisRadiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Acromegaly is commonly complicated by arthropathy and skeletal fragility with high risk of vertebral fractures (VFs). <b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aimed to assess whether VFs may be associated with sagittal spine deformities, arthropathy, impaired quality of life (QoL), pain, and disability. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Thirty-eight patients with acromegaly (median age: 55 years, 20 males) and 38 matched control subjects were evaluated by a low-dose sagittal and coronal planes, X-ray imaging system (EOS®-2D/3D) for morphometric VFs, radiological signs of spine arthropathy, and spine deformities (Cobb thoracic index ≥40°, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis ≥10°, pelvic tilt >20°, and sagittal vertical axis ≥4 cm) determining sagittal spine imbalance. Acromegalic patients were also evaluated by questionnaires for QoL (Acromegaly QoL Questionnaire [AcroQoL] and Short Form-36 [SF-36]) and pain and disability (Western Ontario and McMaster University [WOMAC]). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Acromegalic patients showed higher prevalence of thoracic hyperkyphosis (i.e., Cobb thoracic index ≥40°; <i>p</i> = 0.04) and pelvic tilt >20° (<i>p</i> = 0.02) than control subjects. VFs were found in 34.2% of acromegalic patients (<i>p</i> = 0.003 vs. control subjects), in relationship with higher prevalence of hyperkyphosis (<i>p</i> = 0.03), pelvic tilt >20° (<i>p</i> = 0.04), sagittal vertical axis ≥4 cm (<i>p</i> = 0.03), and moderate/severe subchondral degeneration (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Moreover, patients with VFs had lower AcroQoL general health (<i>p</i> = 0.007) and SF-36 general health (<i>p</i> = 0.002) scores and higher WOMAC pain (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and global (<i>p</i> = 0.009) scores than patients who did not fracture. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In acromegaly, VFs may be associated with spine deformities and sagittal imbalance, spine arthropathy, impaired QoL, and disability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroendocrinologySame topicScoliosis diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207