Outer Membrane Disruption Overcomes Intrinsic, Acquired, and Spontaneous Antibiotic Resistance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The spread of antibiotic resistance is an urgent threat to global health that necessitates new therapeutics. Treatments for Gram-negative pathogens are particularly challenging to identify due to the robust outer membrane permeability barrier in these organisms. Recent discovery efforts have attempted to overcome this hurdle by disrupting the outer membrane using chemical perturbants and have yielded several new peptides and small molecules that allow the entry of otherwise inactive antimicrobials. However, a comprehensive investigation into the strengths and limitations of outer membrane perturbants as antibiotic partners is currently lacking. Herein, we interrogate the interaction between outer membrane perturbation and several common impediments to effective antibiotic use. Interestingly, we discover that outer membrane disruption is able to overcome intrinsic, spontaneous, and acquired antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria, meriting increased attention toward this approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it