BET: A Backtranslation Approach for Easy Data Augmentation in Transformer-based Paraphrase Identification Context
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Newly-introduced deep learning architectures, namely BERT, XLNet, RoBERTa and ALBERT, have been proved to be robust on several NLP tasks. However, the datasets trained on these architectures are fixed in terms of size and generalizability. To relieve this issue, we apply one of the most inexpensive solutions to update these datasets. We call this approach BET by which we analyze the backtranslation data augmentation on the transformer-based architectures. Using the Google Translate API with ten intermediary languages from ten different language families, we externally evaluate the results in the context of automatic paraphrase identification in a transformer-based framework. Our findings suggest that BET improves the paraphrase identification performance on the Microsoft Research Paraphrase Corpus (MRPC) to more than 3% on both accuracy and F1 score. We also analyze the augmentation in the low-data regime with downsampled versions of MRPC, Twitter Paraphrase Corpus (TPC) and Quora Question Pairs. In many low-data cases, we observe a switch from a failing model on the test set to reasonable performances. The results demonstrate that BET is a highly promising data augmentation technique: to push the current state-of-the-art of existing datasets and to bootstrap the utilization of deep learning architectures in the low-data regime of a hundred samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".