КИЇВСЬКИЙ МУЗЕЙ СТАРОЖИТНОСТЕЙ І МИСТЕЦТВ ТА ЙОГО НАСТУПНИКИ У ПЕРШІЙ ЧВЕРТІ ХХ СТОЛІТТЯ. ОГЛЯД ДОКУМЕНТІВ ДЕРЖАВНОГО АРХІВУ КИЇВСЬКОЇ ОБЛАСТІ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the publication is to broaden the source base for the study of the history of the predecessors of the National Museum of Ukrainian History in the first quarter of the twentieth century. The documents used by the State Archives of the Kyiv region were little known for researchers, some of them were discovered for the first time. Among the latter there are the questionnaires of the museum’s employees, filled in by them in the 1920s, which allows not only to consider the staffing of the institution, but also to introduce elements of personification into the general presentation of the material. These and other documents: official reports, accounts, correspondence, tariff information, etc. allowed to reveal and analyze the directions and conditions of the museum’s functioning, its material and physical condition, the ways of forming museum collections, the role of M. Belyashivsky and D. Shcherbakivsky in preserving the legacy of historical memories. Particular attention is paid to the evacuation and re-evacuation of museum values and to the withdrawal of church relics in the 20’s of the 20th century. Key words: Kyiv Museum of Antiquities and Arts; Kyiv City Art, Industrial and Science Museum; First State Museum; M. Belyashivskyi; D. Shcherbakivskyi; evacuation; re-evacuation; withdrawal of museum and church values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".