MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3090140127 · doi:10.19083/tesis/651591

El Sistema de Detracciones y su impacto Tributario y Financiero en las Empresas del sector reparación e instalación de maquinaria y equipo, en el distrito de Miraflores, año 2018

2019· dissertation· es· W3090140127 on OpenAlexaff
D. Luján, Enzo Alexander Castillo Valle

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBusiness, Innovation, and Economy
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present thesis investigation is done with the objective of determine the tax and financial impact of the Detraction System of the in the companies of the Repair & Installation of machinery and equipment sector in Miraflores, year 2018. In the first chapter are mentioned the most important definitions to comprehend the functioning of Detractions. Also, we identify fundamental necessities to argue our hypothesis y prove that Detractions influence in the tax and financial aspects of the companies. Finally, it is mentioned the importance of this sector in the Peruvian economy, its necessary to specify that this sector, Repair & Installation of machinery and equipment, it's a side activity, that belongs to the main sector, called Manufacturing Industry. In the second chapter are proposed the main and secondary problems, hypothesis and objectives. In the third chapter are mentioned the used methodologies. This are qualitative and quantitative. Represented by depth interviews and inquests, respectively. As population of the qualitative methodology, it has been made an interview to two experts in tax and accounting themes. In the quantitative methodology it has been made inquests to an established amount of companies located in Miraflores. In the fourth chapter, it's demonstrated the application of both instruments, qualitative and quantitative. Also, we develop the practical case that proves how Detractions influence in the financial statements of companies. In the end, the results obtained in the interviews, inquests and practical case are analyzed. These results complement one another with the conclusions which validate the main and specific hypothesis of the present study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)Same topicBusiness, Innovation, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207