Küresel Romanda Üstopya Söylemine Bir Örnek: Margaret Atwood’un Antilop ve Flurya Adlı Eseri
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of world literature, which Goethe designed as a universal atmosphere in which national literatures would grow stronger and carry their own riches, has become understood within the paradigm of globalization today.Now, many writers consider this global atmosphere when creating their works.Movements such as postmodernism, the acceleration of communication and translation opportunities lead many authors to produce works based around the world-wide audience such as epidemic, ecology, global warming, migration, identity crisis, minorities, East-West, cultural interaction.No doubt, it is obvious that the main orientation behind these themes is dystopia.Because the history of globalization can also be considered as the history of dystopia.For this reason, one of the main problems of globalizing literature is to warn humanity against this evil course.Here, one of the most important works of global literature intersecting dystopia is Margaret Atwood's novel Antelope and Flurya.Canadian writer Margaret Atwood enriches the possibilities of the global novel while examining various themes within the framework of the two concepts mentioned in this novel.She also responds to criticism of the postcapitalist era for the global novel by putting aside literary and aesthetic concerns and producing it with the logic of "bestseller".On the other hand, it gives the narrative tradition, which stretches from Utopia to dystopia, "the ustopia style", which is a synthesis of both trends.After all, this work seeks to examine Margaret Atwood's Antelope and Flurya through the notion of dystopian imagination in the global novel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".