An analysis of terrestrial water and groundwater storage changes in North America using recent GRACE products
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we use temporal solutions of the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission to study the surface mass variations of hydrological origin in North America. The most recent release (RL06) of GRACE Level 2 data from three processing centers (CSR, JPL, GFZ) and mascon products are used in a combination scheme to produce estimates of terrestrial water storage (TWS) changes for the period 2002–2016. The land hydrology signal is isolated from GRACE data by removing the contribution of two major non-hydrologic processes, i.e., the glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) and the ice mass melting from the glaciated areas of Alaska, Greenland and the Canadian Arctic. The examination of long-term TWS trends revealed strong signatures of the 2011–2015 droughts in California and Texas, as well as accumulation of TWS in the central part of North America. Negative long-term TWS trends associated with ice melting were found around the Hudson Bay region. The TWS changes are dominated by a strong annual and semi-annual signal with higher magnitude in Alaska and along the west coast of North America. An additional study on the estimation of groundwater storage (GWS) changes is performed using the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) model. The GLDAS data are pre-filtered using the same strategy as GRACE data to ensure spectral consistency between them. The general behavior of GWS agrees well with the TWS, especially in terms of positive long-term GWS trends in central North America and strong annual signal in Alaska. Positive GWS trends are also identified in the east US coast.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".