MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3090634009 · doi:10.1177/1120672120960332

The Alberta standardized orbital technique in the management of spheno-orbital meningiomas

2020· article· en· W3090634009 on OpenAlex
Jorge Agi, Jaime Badilla, David E. Steinke, Alim P. Mitha, Ezekiel Weis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Ophthalmology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMeningioma and schwannoma management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryDebulkingOrbit (dynamics)DiplopiaRetrospective cohort studyMeningiomaCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To describe a standardized orbital resection technique and outcomes for spheno-orbital meningiomas with soft-tissue invasion of the orbit. METHODS: A retrospective case review of patients with spheno-orbital meningioma that underwent resection utilizing the Alberta Standardized Orbital Technique (ASOT) between 2008 and 2017 was performed. RESULTS: Twenty patients met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen females and five males, with an average age of 53.4 years (SD ± 13.1 years). Mean follow-up was 57.3 months (SD ± 29.5 months). Eight cases (40%) had attempted resection prior to referral. Based on pre-operative plan, patients were divided into two groups based on goal of resection. Of those with planned complete resection (Group I), 11/13 patients (84.6%) underwent complete excision, with no cases of orbital recurrence. Incomplete resection in two cases occurred because of unexpected involvement of critical intra-cranial structures. Thus, in total 9/20 patients (Group II and 2 from Group I) underwent subtotal resection. Of these incomplete resections, five cases of orbital recurrence were observed; four patients required adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and one patient underwent further debulking surgery. Orbital control was achieved in three of these recurrent cases. Complications reported were persistent postoperative diplopia (three cases/15%) and wound infection (one case/5%). Overall, stable orbital disease was obtained in 18 patients (90%). CONCLUSION: The ASOT demonstrated to be effective, achieving the pre-operative plan of complete resection in 11/13 cases (84.6%) with no recurrence in those with clear orbital margins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it