MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091129504 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2020.3027793

Fast and Reliable Method for Identifying Fault Type and Faulted Phases Using Band Limited Transient Currents

2020· article· en· W3091129504 on OpenAlexaff
Jagannath Wijekoon, Athula Rajapakse, Naushath M. Haleem

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFault (geology)Transient (computer programming)Phase (matter)Fault indicatorEngineeringPower (physics)Three-phaseElectronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)Fault detection and isolationAlgorithmComputer scienceVoltageElectrical engineeringGeologyPhysicsSeismologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method for fault type discrimination and faulted phase identification using instantaneous local current measurements is proposed. Seven current components are obtained from the measured three-phase instantaneous currents through a transformation and band passed filtered to remove the fundamental components and high frequency content. Upon detecting a fault, nine fault discrimination indices are computed taking different ratios of the maximum rates of change of these filtered current components. The indices are used to (i) separate ground faults from the phase-to-phase and three-phase faults, (ii) discriminate phase-to-ground from phase-to-phase-to-ground faults, (iii) differentiate phase-to-phase faults from the three-phase faults, and (iv) identify the faulted phases. As the indices are ratios, decisions are less affected by the fault resistance. The algorithm was validated using a power system simulated in PSCAD/EMTDC. Extensive testing involving more than 10,000 fault scenarios showed that fault type and faulted phases can be successfully identified. The algorithm found some difficulty in identifying the phases involved in phase-to-phase-to-ground faults at certain fault inception angles, and one of the thresholds can be affected by the transposition scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicPower Systems Fault DetectionFrench-language works237,207