MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091198066 · doi:10.1080/15397734.2020.1826963

Large deformation of hyperelastic thick-walled vessels under combined extension-torsion-pressure: analytical solution and FEM

2020· article· en· W3091198066 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElasticity and Material Modeling
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperelastic materialFinite element methodStrain energy density functionTorsion (gastropod)IsotropyMechanicsMaterials scienceInternal pressureCompressibilityStructural engineeringPhysicsComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanical behavior of a thick-walled pressure vessel composed of an incompressible isotropic nonlinearly elastic material subjected to the combined pressure and extension-torsion loading is investigated. An analytical solution is proposed for the general form of the free strain energy density, and different models including well-known Neo-Hookean, Mooney-Rivlin, and recently presented free energy contained two exponential terms -exp-exp model- which is strongly stable and compatible with experimental data, are employed. Comparing different constitutive models involves compatible calibration for a specific material. Thus, the uniaxial and equi-biaxial experimental data of silicon-rubber are simultaneously considered to be used in a calibration optimization procedure. Regarding the application of extension-torsion problem, e.g., biological application in papillary muscles, it is required to inspect this loading on a hollow cylinder and considering the internal and external pressure make the problem more realistic to be employed as capillary muscle. After proposing a closed-form solution for this problem, the finite element analysis of the same problem is conducted to verify the proposed analytical solution. Comparing the results of non-dimensional stress, force and moment distribution of analytical and finite element methods illustrate excellent agreement which confirms the accuracy of the presented solution. Some designing factors including the value of applied twist, axial stretch and pressure, and radius ratio are studied. Results demonstrate that the exp-exp model is more conservative in a small amount of twist and axial stretch. However, it yields a higher value for the stress, force, and moment in larger twists and stretches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it