Optimization of a cavern‐based compressed air energy storage facility with an efficient adaptive genetic algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Due to the dynamic interactions of the components of cavern‐based compressed air energy storage plants, optimizing this system is challenging and a small change in the design parameters, such mass flow rate, compression ratio, expansion ratio can significantly alter the efficiency of the entire system. An adaptive genetic algorithm has been invoked to overcome this challenge, with system efficiency and exergy efficiency as the objective functions. The proposed method provides more flexibility to the optimization process; instead of using fixed rates for the mutation percentage, it is adjusted individually based on the feedback from both the intensity of a component's distributions in the design space and the relative objective function of that component in comparison to other components. The method is utilized for the efficiency optimization of an 80 MW plant with 9° of freedom. For performing the optimization process an automatic coupling between HYSYS and MATLAB was used. The proposed search algorithm discovered a significantly wider range of data by increasing the chance of design parameters relocation with efficient shifting of the searching domain. Outcomes indicated the merit of the algorithm by 6.4% increase in the efficiency of the plant as well as notably decreasing the number of objective function evaluations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it