Long-Term Outcomes of C3 Glomerulopathy and Immune-Complex Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis in Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction The reclassification of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) into immune-complex MPGN (IC-MPGN) and C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) has provided insights into 2 distinct diseases. Although outcomes in adults are poor in both diseases, the pediatric literature is scarce and limited to small, single-center cohorts. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 165 pediatric patients across 17 hospitals to compare outcomes between children with IC-MPGN and C3G. Results Forty-two percent of patients initially diagnosed with MPGN were reclassified as C3G after a review of renal biopsy reports. There was a trend toward higher serum creatinine levels in patients with C3G compared with IC-MPGN both at diagnosis (mean 168.9 [range 45.4–292.4] vs. 93.7 [range 70.7–116.6] μmol/l, P = 0.25) and after a mean follow-up time of 4 years (mean 145.0 (range −8.1 to 298.1) vs 99.1 (range 46.3–151.9) μmol/l, P = 0.47), although the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was not significantly different. Steroid treatment was associated with a significant improvement in eGFR versus no steroids in C3G (mean +43.0 (range 12.9–73.0) vs. −3.0 (range −23.1 to 17.2) ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , P = 0.02) but not in IC-MPGN. Overall kidney function was preserved in both groups although hypertension remained prevalent in 42.5% of the cohort at the last follow-up, and the urine protein/creatinine ratio remained elevated (mean 253.8 [range 91.9–415.7] mg/mmol). Conclusion This large pediatric IC-MPGN/C3G cohort revealed nearly half of the patients were misclassified, and there may be a trend toward worse renal prognosis in C3G although they may have greater steroid responsiveness. The overall prognosis appears to be more favorable than in adults; however, persistent hypertension and proteinuria suggest suboptimal disease control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".