MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3091488684 · doi:10.21608/kvmj.2007.115854

PREVALENCE OF SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS IN A DAIRY HERD IN BENI-SUEF GOVERNORATE

2007· article· en· W3091488684 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Arafa M.S. Meshref, Mona Tolba

Bibliographic record

VenueKafrelsheikh Veterinary Medical Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHerdSubclinical infectionVeterinary medicineMastitisGeographyAnimal scienceBiologyMedicineVirologyMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A total of 115 dairy cows were screened by California mastitis test (CMT) to estimate the prevalence of subclinical mastitis in a dairy herd in Beni-Suef Governorate, as well as Somatic cell count ( SCC) of 28 bulk tank milk samples were estimated using De-Laval cell counter. Mean bulk tank SCC (BTSCC) was 9.5 x 105 + 7.5 x 104 with the highest frequency of distribution (64.3%) lies within the range of 5x 105 to 1 x 106 . The prevalence of subclinical mastitis was 15.2 % on an udder quarter basis and 39.1% on a cow basis. The organisms that were most frequently isolated were E.coli (35.4%), Str.bovis (21.5%), Str.agalactiae (10.8%), Coagulase negative Staphylococci (CNS) (7.7%), S.aureus (6.2%), Str.dysgalactiae (3.1%) and Str.faecalis (3.1%) for single infection while for double infection were Str.bovis with S.aureus (6.2%), Str.bovis with E.coli (3.1%), Str.agalactiae with S.aureus (1.5%) and Str.bovis with CNS (1.4%). In conclusion subclinical mastitis is a serious problem in dairy industry and its early detection is the corner stone in its control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKafrelsheikh Veterinary Medical Journal→Same topicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows→French-language works237,207→