MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091590801 · doi:10.1088/1748-605x/abbcc9

Role of temperature on bio-printability of gelatin methacryloyl bioink in two-step cross-linking strategy for tissue engineering applications

2020· article· en· W3091590801 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohsen Janmaleki, Jun Liu, Milad Kamkar, Milad Azarmanesh, Uttandaraman Sundararaj, Amir Sanati‐Nezhad

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Materials · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsWestern Canada Research GridCompute Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceBiofabricationGelatinTissue engineeringBiocompatibilityPolymerChemical engineeringBiodegradationExtrusionViscoelasticitySelf-healing hydrogelsRheologyDrug deliveryComposite materialBiomedical engineeringNanotechnologyPolymer chemistryChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additive manufacturing has shown promising results in reconstructing three-dimensional (3D) living tissues for various applications, including tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, drug discovery, and high-throughput drug screening. In extrusion-based bioprinters, stable formation of filaments and high-fidelity deposition of bioinks are the primary challenges in fabrication of physiologically relevant tissue constructs. Among various bioinks, gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) is known as a photocurable and physicochemically tunable hydrogel with a demonstrated biocompatibility and tunable biodegradation properties. The two-step crosslinking of GelMA (reversible thermal gelation and permanent photo-crosslinking) has attracted researchers to make complex tissue constructs. Despite promising results in filament formation and printability of this hydrogel, the effect of temperature on physicochemical properties, cytocompatibility, and biodegradation of the hydrogel are to be investigated. This work studies the effect of thermoreversible, physical crosslinking on printability of GelMA. The results of 3D printing of GelMA at different temperatures followed by irreversible chemical photo-crosslinking show that the decrease in temperature improves the filament formation and shape fidelity of the deposited hydrogel, particularly at the temperatures around 15 °C. Time dependant mechanical testing of the printed samples revealed that decreasing the extruding temperature increases the elastic properties of the extruded filaments. Furthermore, our novel approach in minimizing the slippage effect during rheological study enabled to measure changes in linear and non-linear viscoelastic properties of the printed samples at different temperatures. A considerable increase in storage modulus of the extruded samples printed at lower temperatures confirms their higher solid behavior. Scanning electron microscopy revealed a remarkable decrease in porosity of the extruded hydrogels by decreasing the temperature. Chemical analysis by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and circular dichroism showed a direct relationship between the coil-helix transition in hydrogel macromers and its physical alterations. Finally, biodegradation and cytocompatibility of the extruded hydrogels decreased at lower extruding temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomedical MaterialsSame topic3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207