MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091598382 · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2020.09.014

Letter to editor in response to De vloo et al.: Open fracture of DBS leads with normal electrical impedance

2020· letter· en· W3091598382 on OpenAlexafffund
Zelma H. T. Kiss, Verónica Bruno

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain stimulation · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsOntario Brain InstituteUniversity of Calgary
FundersLuonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen ToimikuntaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDystonia Medical Research Foundation Canada
KeywordsDeep brain stimulationMedicineDystoniaCrutchDyskinesiaPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPallidotomyParkinson's diseaseInternal medicineDiseasePsychiatryStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We here add a similar case to the report by Drs. DeVloo, Vermeulen, Vandenberghe and Nuttin [[1]DeVloo P. Vermeulen L. Vandenberghe W. Nuttin B. Open fracture of deep brain stimulation leads with normal electrical impedances.Brain Stim. 2020; 13: 1639-1641https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.09.018Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar], describing a patient with intact impedance measures despite an internal breakage of a deep brain stimulator (DBS) extension. Our male patient underwent subthalamic (STN) DBS for advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) in 2004 at the age of 48 (3389 leads connected to two 7482A-51 extensions, Kinetra, Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis MN). He underwent several pulse generator replacements (later in 2004 after a lightning strike, then for battery depletions in 2009, 2014, and with a rechargeable Activa RC in 2017). His PD progressed, especially in his right body with significant dystonia in his hand, requiring joint fusions. His gait was most affected, but he was able to ambulate around his home with a walker. He had difficulty tolerating PD medications due to dyskinesia, but started taking 4 tablets of levodopa/benserazide (50/12.5 mg) daily in 2018 in addition to amantadine for symptom management. In 2020 at the age of 64, he developed shocks in his head/neck, both spontaneously and sometimes with neck movements. Impedances of all DBS leads were completely normal and unchanged from measurements obtained at previous annual check-ups. Notably, the impedances were different in the right and left leads (Fig. 1A), and remained the same with his head turned to different positions. Skull and neck radiography revealed an apparent wire disconnection in the left DBS extension (Fig. 1B). While he had not had skull radiography since his original surgery, chest radiography showing the extension coming down from the neck to the pulse generator indicated that this breakage was present for at least one year prior (Fig. 1C). Based on his clinical picture we wondered how long this may have been an issue, but not identified due to normal impedance measures. The patient underwent revision of his extension and intra-operative findings showed a physically intact extension cable with the wiring within the extension being pale and seemingly having lost its coil (Fig. 1D). Post-operative course was marked by worsening of gait, such that he required gradual adjustment in stimulation parameters, medications, and botulinum toxin injections over 2 weeks in hospital, to regain his ability to walk with a walker. It is not clear how normal impedances could be measured using the clinician programmer (N’Vision Clinician Programmer model 8840 and CT900D Clinician tablet) with such apparent wire disconnection. Possibly the intact external insulation of the silastic cover of the extension could allow these measurements to be obtained. Regardless, it is a concerning problem with long term DBS. This case further emphasizes the need to use radiography to check connections in advanced PD patients, especially those having falls, even with normal impedance measurements. No specific funding for this case report.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0180.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain stimulationSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207