Alternative conformations and motions adopted by 30S ribosomal subunits visualized by cryo-electron microscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is only after recent advances in cryo-electron microscopy that it is now possible to describe at high-resolution structures of large macromolecules that do not crystalize. Purified 30S subunits interconvert between an "active" and "inactive" conformation. The active conformation was described by crystallography in the early 2000s, but the structure of the inactive form at high resolution remains unsolved. Here we used cryo-electron microscopy to obtain the structure of the inactive conformation of the 30S subunit to 3.6 Å resolution and study its motions. In the inactive conformation, an alternative base-pairing of three nucleotides causes the region of helix 44, forming the decoding center to adopt an unlatched conformation and the 3' end of the 16S rRNA positions similarly to the mRNA during translation. Incubation of inactive 30S subunits at 42°C reverts these structural changes. The air-water interface to which ribosome subunits are exposed during sample preparation also peel off some ribosomal proteins. Extended exposures to low magnesium concentrations make the ribosomal particles more susceptible to the air-water interface causing the unfolding of large rRNA structural domains. Overall, this study provides new insights about the conformational space explored by the 30S ribosomal subunit when the ribosomal particles are free in solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".