MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091802000 · doi:10.1101/2020.10.09.332015

Pax7 pioneer factor action requires both paired and homeo DNA binding domains

2020· preprint· en· W3091802000 on OpenAlexafffund
Audrey Pelletier, Alexandre Mayran, Arthur Gouhier, James G. Omichinski, Aurélio Balsalobre, Jacques Drouin

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Clinical Research Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCompute Canada
KeywordsDNAHeterochromatinBinding siteBiologyChromatinTranscription factorDNA binding siteDNA-binding proteinGeneticsEnhancerTranscription (linguistics)PromoterGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The pioneer transcription factor Pax7 contains two DNA binding domains (DBD), a paired and a homeo domain. Previous work on Pax7 and the related Pax3 had shown that each DBD can bind a cognate DNA sequence, thus defining two targets of binding and possibly modalities of action. Genomic targets of Pax7 pioneer action leading to chromatin opening are enriched for composite DNA target sites containing juxtaposed binding sites for both paired and homeo domains. The present work investigated the implication of both DBDs in pioneer action. We now show that the composite sequence is a higher affinity Pax7 binding site compared to either paired or homeo binding sites and that efficient binding to this site involves both DBDs. We also show that a Pax7 monomer binds composite sites and that methylation of cytosines within the binding site does not affect binding, which is consistent with pioneer action exerted at methylated DNA sites within nucleosomal heterochromatin. Finally, introduction of single amino acid mutations in either the paired or homeo domain that impair binding to cognate DNA sequences showed that both DBDs must be intact for pioneer action. In contrast, only the paired domain is required for low affinity binding of heterochromatin sites. Thus, Pax7 pioneer action on heterochromatin requires unique protein:DNA interactions that are more complex compared to its simpler DNA binding modalities at accessible enhancer target sites. Significance Statement Pioneer transcription factors have the unique ability to recognize DNA target sites within closed heterochromatin and to trigger chromatin opening. Only a fraction of the heterochromatin recruitment sites of pioneers are subject to chromatin opening. The molecular basis for this selectivity is unknown and the present work addressed the importance of DNA sequence affinity for selection of sites to open. The pioneering ability of the pioneer factor Pax7 is not strictly determined by affinity or DNA sequence of binding sites, nor by number or methylation status of DNA sites. Mutation analyses showed that recruitment to heterochromatin is primarily dependent on the Pax7 paired domain whereas the ability to open chromatin requires both paired and homeo DNA binding domains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFrench-language works237,207