MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091812244 · doi:10.4103/pajo.pajo_29_20

Expression of BRCA1-associated protein 1 in primary tumors and metastasis in an animal model of uveal melanoma

2020· article· en· W3091812244 on OpenAlexaff
ClaraE Castro, JuliaValdemarin Burnier, Sabrina Bergeron, Jacqueline Coblentz, Ana Beatriz Toledo Dias, Miguel Noel Burnier

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Pan-American Journal of Ophthalmology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Oncology and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBAP1MetastasisMelanomaImmunohistochemistryPathologyPrimary tumorMedicineStainingMonoclonal antibodyMetastasis suppressorCancer researchAntibodyCancerImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular tumor in adults. Despite successful local treatment, approximately 50% of these patients develop lethal metastatic disease. BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) encodes BAP1, which functions as a tumor suppressor. Inactivation by a somatic mutation in BAP1 results in a loss of protein expression, which is associated with increased risk of metastasis.Aim: To analyze the expression of BAP1 protein in primary uveal tumors and their corresponding metastasis in an animal model of UM and to determine whether BAP1 expression is lost during the metastatic process.Subjects and Methods: Postmortem eyes and lungs with metastasis from nine rabbits previously inoculated with human UM cells expressing BAP1 (92.1 strain) were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples using a monoclonal BAP1 (C-4) antibody. Expression was evaluated by the extent and intensity of staining. All primary tumors and metastasis were positive for BAP1. Results: The staining was diffuse and intense in the primary tumors of four rabbits (67%), focal-intense in one rabbit and focal-mild in one rabbit. All lung metastasis showed focal staining. All animals with intense BAP1 staining in the primary tumor showed mild BAP1 in the metastasis. Discussion: A predominant pattern observed between primary and metastatic lesion shows a transition from moderate into mild intensity and diffuse into the focal extent, suggesting a decrease in BAP1 expression. Future studies, including the human tissue of primary UM and their corresponding metastasis, should be performed to corroborate these findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Pan-American Journal of OphthalmologySame topicOcular Oncology and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207