Better understanding the hydrology of peri-urban ephemeral pools serving as habitats for the Western Chorus Frog
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ephemeral (vernal) pools are small hydrologically isolated wetlands found in a large variety of environments across the world. They provide breeding habitats for amphibians during their spring and early summer period of hydrological activity. Because of their small size and intermittent nature, many questions remain unanswered about their hydrology and concerning best strategies to improve their resilience to human activities and climate change. In the peri-urban area around Montreal City (Monteregie region, Quebec, Canada), ephemeral pools are habitats to the endangered Western Chorus Frog. In an attempt to protect the remaining population and to improve the reproductive success of these frogs, a study was funded by the Quebec Ministry of forest, fauna and parks to understand the processes driving pool hydrology and especially pool hydroperiod (length of hydrologically active period after snowmelt). Fourty-eight pools located in forested, agricultural and low-density housing developments were monitored for water levels since 2015. Seven of these pools were fully characterized for bathymetry and geology (field measurements), groundwater levels (hourly monitoring) and drainage area (LiDAR data). The pools are located on relatively flat land, in shallow irregular basins within generally low permeability Quaternary sediments. The pools hold relatively small volumes of water, with maximum annual water depths between 0.2 and 1.1 m (observed in April or May). Their areas vary between 100 and 5000 m2. The hydrologically active periods after snowmelt (starting after the last frost when mean temperature > 5°C over five days and ending when the pool is dry) vary between 15 and 150 days. At some sites, the hydroperiods were shorter than the required length for reproductive success of the Western Chorus Frog, which could explain the population decline. These short hydroperiods appear to be linked to the presence of human impacts in the pool vicinity. Water level reactions after precipitation are indications that pool hydrology is influenced by a relatively small contributing area rather than by their apparent drainage area (ratio Δh/rain < 4). Head gradients between water levels in the nearby sediments and pool water levels underline the role of the shallow groundwater in maintaining humid conditions in the pools and in reactivating the pools during the summer. Simple water budget models confirm this groundwater input and show that surface and hypodermic runoff is the main water source to the pools. The models show that, pool hydroperiods will start earlier under a changing climate, because of warmer winters, but will not necessarily be longer due to higher temperatures and increased evapotranspiration. The models will be used to estimate the effects of human interventions (e.g. drainage, residential) on pool hydroperiods, thus contributing to plan pool protection strategies that could help protect the Western Chorus Frog.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".