MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091882532 · doi:10.1039/d0dt03415k

Phosphinoborane interception at magnesium by borane-assisted phosphine-borane dehydrogenation

2020· article· en· W3091882532 on OpenAlexaff
Louis J. Morris, Nasir A. Rajabi, Michael S. Hill, Ian Manners, Claire L. McMullin, Mary F. Mahon

Bibliographic record

VenueDalton Transactions · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganoboron and organosilicon chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilUniversity of BristolUniversity of Bath
KeywordsDehydrogenationBoraneMagnesiumPhosphineChemistryTolueneAmmonia boraneMetalInorganic chemistryReactivity (psychology)CatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reactions of B(C6F5)3 with the β-diketiminato (BDI) alkaline-earth phosphidoborane complexes, 1a [(BDI)Ca(H3B·PPh2)] and 1b [(BDI)Mg(H3B·PPh2)]2 (BDI = [HC{C(CH3)N(2,6-iPr-C6H3)}2]-) result in the formation of phosphinodiboronate complexes 4a [(BDI)Ca(η6-toluene){H3B·PPh2·B(C6F5)3}] and 4b [(BDI)Mg{H3B·PPh2·B(C6F5)3}]. Calcium complex 4a is stable in aromatic solvents at room temperature and does not display well-defined onward reactivity at elevated temperatures. Magnesium complex 4b undergoes a room temperature transformation to provide the known hydridoborate derivative 3b [(BDI)Mg{HB(C6F5)3}] and an N,P,N'-ligated species, 5 [{HC(C(CH3)N(2,6-iPr-C6H3))2(H2BPPh2)}Mg{H3B·PPh2·B(C6F5)3}] that results from interception of the putative phosphinoborane, H2B = PPh2, by the BDI ligand backbone following B(C6F5)3-mediated hydride abstraction. NMR spectroscopic investigations were supported by DFT calculations, which suggested a mechanism involving B(C6F5)3 migration and hydride abstraction within the coordination sphere of magnesium. Interception of H2B = PPh2 by B(C6F5)3 is proposed to stabilise this species, whilst activating it towards ligand-centred nucleophilic attack. The significant stabilisation energy calculated for the Ca-π(toluene) interaction in 4a accounts for the contrasting outcomes between the two Ae-elements. The crystal structures of compounds 4a and 5 are presented and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalton TransactionsSame topicOrganoboron and organosilicon chemistryFrench-language works237,207