Three hundred years of snowpack variability in southwestern British Columbia reconstructed from tree‐rings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Recent snow droughts in southwestern British Columbia (BC), Canada, have reduced seasonal streamflow during the typically dry late‐spring and summer months, leading to socio‐economic and ecological impacts that draw attention to the impending consequences of climate change. Knowledge of annual winter snowfall variability within this region is largely derived from a sparse network of short‐duration (≤50 years) snow survey stations. In this paper, we develop an annual April 1 snow water equivalent (SWE) reconstruction from living tree‐ring chronologies that offer a perspective on long‐term natural snowpack variability. The dendrohydrological model estimates the first principal component April 1 SWE for the southwestern regions of BC to 1711. Spectral analysis identified dominant multidecadal April 1 SWE variability over the pre‐instrumental period. The reconstruction successfully captures known instrumental period influences of La Niña oscillations on reconstructed SWE, suggesting that our tree‐ring based the reconstruction has the potential to provide insights on pre‐instrumental ocean–atmosphere links with southwestern BC snowpack dynamics. Runs analysis suggests pre‐instrumental snow droughts have been more than twice as long in duration and severity than during the observed period which indicates the instrumental record may not capture the full range of April 1 SWE variability. The reconstruction provides the first high‐resolution description of SWE over the past 300 years in southwestern BC and is of immediate use to regional water resource managers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".