Bibliographic record
Abstract
This first-ever conference convened by the Champa peoples, of whom theCham (both Muslim and non-Muslim) are an important component, focusedon the “Sociocultural Issues of Champa 175 Years after Its Disappearance(1832-2007).” Held on 7-8 July 2007, in San Jose, CA, it was opened byChuck Reed (mayor, San Jose), Musa Porome (chairman, Organizing Committee),Ahmad Yahya (Member of Parliament, Cambodia; founder, RadioSapCham [Voice of the Cham]), and R. Obleo (a representative of theChampa people of the Central Highlands, Vietnam, now living in America).Session One, “Language and Culture,” moderated by Mohammad ZainBin Musa (University Kebangsaan Malaysia), began with Marc Brunelle(University of Ottawa, Canada), who spoke on “Diglossia, Bilingualism,and Literacy: Can Eastern Cham Be Revitalized?” Brunelle, a fluent Chamand Vietnamese speaker, touched upon a core problem; the Cham languagehas not developed enough to accommodate modernity. Thus, the easternCham are generally bilingual, the formal language is limited to importantevents, the spoken language contains many Vietnamese words, regional pronunciationshave appeared, Cham-language written literature is very rare,and the community (traditionally) has opposed the script’s romanization. Hesees two choices to ensure its survival: romanize or simplify the script.David G. Sox (United States Coast Guard Pacific Command, Oakland,CA) presented “Toward a Book/CD-ROM of the Culture and Customs ofAncient Champa and Modern Champa Peoples.” He is seeking the community’sactive participation in documenting Champa’s geography, prehistory ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.597 | 0.302 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".