Three Mud System Allows Successful Completion of >22,000' Slimhole with 0.5 ppg Window through MPD Optimization of Trip Procedure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Spirit River Group in Western Canada has always been difficult to drill and complete due to the presence of natural faulting in shaley formations interbedded with coal. MPD techniques allow the successful drilling of these wells; however, completing these wells has been extremely challenging. On this well, getting liner to bottom without total losses should not have been possible. To address this, a design that used a three mud system in combination with MPD was utilized. With a diversion sub placed at the heel, the wellbore fluid column consisted of a highly underbalanced drilling fluid in the lateral, a descending column of slightly underbalanced stripping fluid placed in the vertical section, and an overbalanced column of kill fluid backfilled into the annulus from surface. During the liner run, this three-fluid system design smoothly reduces the hydrostatic pressure at proportional rates to the increase in liner surge. This balances the wellbore at the time the RCD is installed behind the liner. The combination of factors saw full returns to surface during the liner run and, once on bottom, allows the rig to break circulation for the final displacement to completions fluids. With the successful implementation of this 3-fluid system, the operator was able to drill further, past 22,000’, as it is now possible to run and deploy the liner without expecting the loss of the wellbore's volume of fluid on these tight window wells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".