MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Indigenous Peoples, settler colonialism, and access to health care in rural and northern Ontario

2020· article· en· W3091961872 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kristin Burnett, Chris Sanders, Beth Halperin, Scott A. Halperin

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth & Place · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreSt. Francis Xavier UniversityLakehead University
FundersCanadian Immunization Research Network
KeywordsRuralityIndigenousColonialismHealth careRural healthSociologyRural areaSocioeconomicsEconomic growthGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Canada rural and northern communities, particularly Indigenous communities, face challenges disproportionate to their urban counterparts in accessing health care services. Existing health research on rural communities has tended to emphasize and reinforce the rural/urban dichotomy in access to and delivery of services, leaving the notion of "rural" as an under-interrogated concept. Drawing on a qualitative study of health care providers, community members, and Indigenous Elders, we explore Indigenous people's beliefs about vaccination to complicate notions of rurality in order to illuminate the ways in which space and settler colonialism both shape and limit choices around health care access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth & PlaceSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207