MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Slow subduction initiation forces fast ophiolite formation

2020· article· en· W3091976303 on OpenAlexaff
Mathieu Soret, Guillaume Bonnet, Philippe Agard, Kyle P. Larson, John M. Cottle, Benoît Dubacq, Mark Button

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOphioliteGeologySubductionMetamorphic rockLithosphereMantle (geology)SlabGeochemistryPartial meltingStackingTectonicsPetrologyGeophysicsSeismologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metamorphic soles are m to ~500 m thick tectonic slices welded beneath most large- scale ophiolites (usually ~20 km thick). They typically show a steep inverted metamorphic structure where the pressure and temperature (T) conditions of crystallization increase upward, from the base of the sole (500 ± 100°C at 0.5 ± 0.2 GPa) to the contact with the overlying peridotite (800 ± 100°C at 1.0 ± 0.2 GPa). The inverted T gradient was historically interpreted as a result of heat transfer from the incipient mantle wedge toward the nascent slab synchronously with the overlying ophiolite formation (within only 1-2 Myrs). Their mineralogical assemblage and deformation pattern provide major constraints on the nature and the timing of the processes controlling the dynamics of the plate interface during early subduction. Soret et al. (2017, 2019) recently reappraised the tectonic–petrological model for the formation of metamorphic soles below ophiolites, showing that the present-day structure of the sole results from the successive stacking of several homogeneous oceanic crustal slivers (without internal T gradient). This stacking marks the evolution of rheological properties of slab material and peridotites of the upper plate as the plate interface progressively cools (Agard et al., 2016). These findings outline the thermal and mechanical complexity of early subduction dynamics, and highlight the need for refined numerical modelling studies. Lu-Hf geochronology on garnet from the Oman metamorphic sole has recently shown that the earliest accreted subunit, found directly against the upper plate mantle, was initially buried ≥ 8 Ma earlier than previously estimated (Guilmette et al., 2017). These results imply initiation ≥ 8 Ma before the formation of the ophiolite, which underscores the common belief that ophiolite-sole couples record spontaneous subduction initiation and rather indicates far-field forcing long before upper plate extension and mantle upwelling. We herein present new U-Pb titanite and monazite petrochronology across the different sub-units of the Oman metamorphic sole. Our results confirm the time lag of several million years between subduction initiation and the ophiolite formation, therefore supporting the recently proposed model of far-field forced subduction initiation. They also reveal a significant time lag between the underplating and exhumation of each sub-unit of the sole.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→