Open-Hole 3D Braided Composites Strength Prediction and Stress Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The stress concentration caused by notches is a common engineering issue for composite structure application. 3D braided composite possess excellent damage tolerance compared to common laminates. The tensile properties of 3D braided composite with open-hole and un-notched were experimentally examined. The mechanic properties of 3D braided composite in other directions are predicted using FGM (Fabric Geometry Model) and finite element analysis. The stress distributions around the hole and perpendicular to the loading direction are analyzed based on Abaqus software. The simulation results were compared with Lekhnitskii's analytical study. The open-hole strength of 3D braided composite was predicted respectively using Average stress failure criteria, Point stress failure criteria (PSC), and also the progressive failure analysis based on different failure criteria. The predicted strength results were compared to the experimental values. The results show the PSC predicted strength matched the experiment, while the progressive failure analysis can predict the failure initiation, propagation and final failure mode.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".