Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wholeness and Holiness in Education: An Islamic Perspective is a veryinteresting book. Although the book is a result of her experience as aMuslim graduate student in Canada, she does not mention any personal reasonsfor writing this book, but rather tackles it very lightly without mentioningthe hard experiences she faced when her faith was questioned. AMuslim who has taken her faith for granted for years and had had little orno communication with the West was questioned for the first time in her lifeabout many aspects of her faith and found herself unable to provide adequateanswers. Her book is the result of such an experience, one whichmany others in her circumstances and situation have faced and will have toface. Although the author frequently tackles abstract ideas, she always providesscholarly explanations and discussions by quoting and elaboratingupon many well-known figures in various disciplines.The book is divided into four parts and has a total of nine chapters. Thefirst part, “Reflection on Personal Experience,” includes two chapters. Inthem, she tries to take the reader from her own personal experience to thebook’s goal: preparing Muslim students in their homelands’ educationalsystems to think and question their faith so that they can stand on solidground. In chapter 1, “The Spiritual and Intellectual Journey,” she apologizesfor including her personal experience growing up as a Muslim.Actually, more elaboration upon such experiences and on the conflicts shefaced while studying in Canada would have been appreciated, as such atopic requires that personal experiences be shared, given that they are notlimited to one person but rather to millions of individuals. Chapter 2,“Spirituality: Woman’s Best-Kept Secret,” further analyzes the significanceof such experiences to women specifically ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".