Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work is a review essay of two books: Africanity Redefined: CollectedEssays of Ali A. Mazrui, edited by Ali Alamin Mazrui, Ricardo ReneLaremont, Tracia Leacock Seghatolislami, Michael A. Toler, and FouadKalouche (Africa World Press: 2002) and Governace and Leadership:Debating the African Condition: Ali Mazrui and His Critics, edited byAlamin M. Mazrui and Willy Mutunga (Africa World Press: 2003) Theseare the first two volumes in a three-volume work dealing with the correspondenceamong Ali Mazrui and his opponents, as well as his supporters,on issues relating to Africa.Mazrui, a Kenyan scholar, is currently Albert Schweitzer professor inhumanities and director of the Institute of Global Cultural Studies, BinghamtonUniversity, State University of New York. An Oxford scholar, he isalso Albert Luthuli professor-at-large in humanities and development studiesat the University of Jos, Nigeria, as well as Andrew D. White professorat-large emeritus and senior scholar in Africana studies at CornellUniversity (www.islamonline.net). In addition, he has authored many publicationsand television and radio documentaries. Perhaps his best-knownwork in the West is his BBC radio and television documentary series “TheAfricans,” which was co-produced by the BBC and the public televisionstation WETA.Writing on Mazrui, Sulayman Nyang of Howard University states:Ali Mazrui is a controversial but independent and original thinker. He isa master word-monger and certainly does not belong to that class of menwho lament that words fail them. …It is because of his conjurer’s abilityto negotiate between the realm of serious issues and the province of ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".