MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092158747 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.928

Maternal diabetes during pregnancy and carotid intima-media thickness in children

2020· article· en· W3092158747 on OpenAlexaff
Arnaud Chioléro, Adina Mihaela Epure, Magali Leyvraz, Daniela Anker, Yvan Mivelaz, Stefano Di Bernardo, Bruno R. da Costa, Nicole Sekarski

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyOffspringGestational diabetesDiabetes mellitusObstetricsObservational studyIntima-media thicknessType 2 diabetesConfidence intervalType 1 diabetesMeta-analysisInternal medicineGestationEndocrinologyCarotid arteries

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Cardiovascular risk over the life course may be related to intrauterine risk factors, for instance, the exposure to maternal diabetes. Our objective was to systematically review studies that assessed the association of maternal diabetes during pregnancy and carotid-intima media thickness (CIMT), a marker of cardiovascular risk, in children. Methods We followed methods outlined in a published protocol for a systematic review on risk factors and determinants of CIMT in children (PROSPERO registration: CRD42017075169). Standardized mean differences in CIMT between offspring of women with and without diabetes during pregnancy were computed. Random effects meta-analyses were performed. The reliability of CIMT measurements was assessed. Funding SNSF 32003B-163240. Results Three observational studies involving 658 children were retained. Two studies were conducted in Europe and one in Australia. Age at CIMT assessment ranged from 2 days to 8 years. Two studies evaluated gestational diabetes during pregnancy and found no difference in CIMT among exposed children compared to controls (0.00 (95% CI: -0.41 to 0.41); 0.00 (95% CI; -0.28 to 0.28)). One study, that did not specify the type of diabetes evaluated, identified a higher CIMT (0.46 (95% CI; -0.07 to 1.00)). The pooled standardized mean difference in CIMT between offspring of women with and without diabetes during pregnancy was 0.08 (95% CI: -0.16 to 0.33; I2: 17.1%). Conclusions Overall, there is no clear association between maternal diabetes during pregnancy and offspring's CIMT. The degree of confidence in results is limited by the low number of studies, with relatively small sample sizes and a low number of participants exposed to maternal diabetes. Key messages Children exposed to maternal diabetes have no substantial alterations in vascular structure. More research is needed to inform primordial prevention of cardiovascular disease among these children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.005
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207