Identification and expression analysis of chloroplast ribonucleoproteins (cpRNPs) in Arabidopsis and rice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chloroplast ribonucleoproteins (cpRNPs) are implicated in splicing, editing, and stability control of chloroplast RNAs as well as in regulating development and stress tolerance. To facilitate a comprehensive understanding of their functions, we carried out a genome-wide identification, curation, and phylogenetic analysis of cpRNP genes in Oryza sativa (rice) and Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis). Ten cpRNP genes were identified in each of Arabidopsis and rice genomes based on the presence of two RRM (RNA-recognition motif) domains and an N-terminal chloroplast targeting signal peptide in the predicted proteins. These proteins are localized to chloroplasts. Gene expression analysis revealed that cpRNP genes have differential tissue expression patterns and some cpRNP genes are induced by abiotic stresses such as cold, heat, and drought. Taken together, our study provides a comprehensive annotation of the cpRNP gene family and their expression patterns in Arabidopsis and rice which will facilitate further studies on their roles in plant growth and stress responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".