MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092230221 · doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102913

The paleoposition of the Antimonio depositional system (Sonora, Mexico): New insights from nonparametric and multivariate analysis of detrital zircon data

2020· article· en· W3092230221 on OpenAlexaff
Eric Heerwagen, Joshua H.F.L. Davies, Susanne Theodora Schmidt, Alexey Ulianov, Rossana Martini

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of South American Earth Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsSedimentary depositional environmentGeologyZirconSiliciclasticPaleontologyLaurentiaBasementTerraneGeochronologyPaleomagnetismPermianOrdovicianArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Antimonio depositional system ranges from the Upper Permian to the uppermost Lower Jurassic. It is the only locality of Upper Triassic shallow marine carbonates in Mexico and through its speculative basement; it provides a potential link between the terrane framework of Mexico and the North American Cordillera. Various paleotectonic models have been proposed to explain the mixed siliciclastic-carbonate successions of the Antimonio depositional system in Sonora, Mexico, including interpreting it as a distinct allochthonous terrane or having a position close to the Laurentian basement. Microfacies, paleontological and paleomagnetic studies have suggested a paleogeographic position in low latitudes close to Laurentia. However, the basement structures of the Antimonio depositional system are poorly known and have numerous uncertainties. Here, we use detrital zircon geochronology to identify the sources of terrestrial sediments of the Antimonio depositional system and to propose potential sedimentary distribution patterns. The results allow us to clarify its paleotectonic position and consolidate the geodynamic model of González-León et al. (2005), in which the Antimonio depositional system was attached to the Caborca block. Four major zircon age distributions of detrital zircon were determined in the Barra los Tanques and Sierra del Álamo sections of the Rio Asunción Formation (Antimonio depositional system: (1) a Permo-Triassic group (207–292 Ma); (2) the group/population of 1.0–1.2 Ga; (3) a group clustering between 1.3 and 1.5 Ga and (4) the group of 1.6–1.8 Ga. This new data set was compared with published detrital zircon data from localities along the North American Cordillera, using two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests and hierarchical clustering. The results allow us to identify potential sources located in the Cordilleran continental arc and the ancestral Rocky Mountains, as well as in sediments and volcanic deposits of their respective surrounding areas. We suggest that the transport for these sediments was likely provided through the Chinle river system, and long-shore oceanic currents. Combining published data from Magsat magnetic anomalies with stratigraphy based paleontology, and our new geochronological data analysis, we suggest that the Antimonio depositional system must have been part of Laurentia and potentially linked to the Caborca block during the Late Triassic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of South American Earth SciencesSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207