MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092231433 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3029550

Single-Point Detection Architecture via Liquid Crystal Modulation for Hyperspectral Imaging Systems

2020· article· en· W3092231433 on OpenAlexafffund
C. Harrison Brodie, Christopher M. Collier

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Polarization and Ellipsometry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingSnapshot (computer storage)Computer sciencePhotodiodeSpatial frequencyOpticsIntermodulationFrequency domainModulation (music)Optical transfer functionComputer visionArtificial intelligenceRemote sensingTelecommunicationsPhysicsAcousticsGeologyBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) architectures can acquire one-dimension of spatial information and one-dimension of spectral information on a two-dimensional image sensor for an image, such as in the traditional line-scan HSI architecture. However, development of HSI architectures for multiple spatial dimensions is challenging as there is not a third dimension on a two-dimensional image sensor on which to store spectral information. The presented work introduces a snapshot HSI architecture to alleviate this issue. The snapshot HSI architecture incorporates single-point detection via liquid crystal modulation and a single photodiode. Mixing of hyperspectral data is expressed as intermodulation frequency products within the Fourier-domain. Spatial information can be recorded through spatial frequencies and spectral information can be recorded through spectral frequencies. Such modulation is achieved through liquid crystal spatial and spectral arrays of an image beam. The spatial and spectral modulation frequencies form intermodulation frequency products that are recorded on the single photodiode and can be uncovered through Fourier-domain filtering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicOptical Polarization and EllipsometryFrench-language works237,207