Brazilian’s Health Policy and its misalignment with international guidelines for Health Promotion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Following the First Health Promotion Conference in Ottawa in 1986, several other global level Conferences were held, and Shanghai was the last City to host the 9th Health Promotion Conference in 2016, where several world leaders assume commitments that meet the common cause of the topic in question, presenting robust outcomes such as the Letters, Declarations and Implementation Guides. This work aimed to analyze the coherence of the development of the current National Health Plan in Brazil in relation to the central axes of the most recent international documents, referring to the Shanghai Declaration and the Guide for the National Implementation of the Shanghai Declaration. The results showed that Brazil presents a National Health Plan that definitely does not include the actions proposed in the most recent international documents, such as the Shanghai Conference report and the Guide for National Implementation of the Shanghai Declaration. Paradoxically, Brazil has other institutionally implemented instruments that consider the activities recommended from these international documents in a very satisfactory way. Among these instruments are a specific National Policy on Health Promotion, and several Health Care Programs and Networks aimed at some of the National Policy on Health Promotion strengthening axes, such as the National Tobacco Control Program, the Health at School Program, the Health Gym Program, in addition to other related National Policies, such as the National Policy on Integrative and Complementary Practices and the National Policy on Medicinal Plants and Herbal Medicines. It is concluded that the National Health Plan is a symbolic instrument that is not in line with international recommendations and, contradictorily, it is also not in line with the own policies and programs that are successfully implemented and developed in national territory. Key messages There is a misalignment between the real meaning that a National Health Plan should present and its current content, what leads to an insuficent instrument for enhancing health promotion. While the national health plan is out of alignment with strengthening health promotion, other nationwide specific policies developed reinforce international guidelines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.034 | 0.041 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".