MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092249496 · doi:10.21577/0103-5053.20200202

Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Benzo[f]indole-4,9-diones N-Linked to Carbohydrate Chains as New Type of Antitumor Agents

2020· article· en· W3092249496 on OpenAlexaff
Flaviana Dias, Fabiana Sélos Guerra, Fernanda Alves Lima, Yasmin de Castro, Vı́tor F. Ferreira, Vinícius R. Campos, Patrícia Dias Fernandes, Anna C. Cunha

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Brazilian Chemical Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicBioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
FundersFundação Oswaldo CruzFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsIndole testChemistryCarbohydrateCombinatorial chemistryStereochemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we report the synthesis of three series of carbohydrate-based benzo[f]indole-4,9-diones and amino-1,4-naphthoquinone derivatives and evaluated their cytotoxic activity against eight human cancer cell lines. Several compounds showed a promising cytotoxic activity toward the tumor cell lines (half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) < 10.0 M). The importance of the substitution pattern of the quinone derivatives on the antitumor activity was also discussed. 3-Carboethoxy-2-methyl-benzo[f]indole-4,9-dione derivatives were more cytotoxic than their parent compounds and amino-1,4-naphthoquinones. Unlike clinically useful anticancer agent doxorubicin, the majority of synthesized compounds did not exhibit any lytic effects against erythrocytes or normal human leukocytes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.260
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Brazilian Chemical SocietySame topicBioactive Compounds and Antitumor AgentsFrench-language works237,207