MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092326973 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.891

Resilience factors associated with physical function in vulnerable older adults from four countries

2020· article· en· W3092326973 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jacob Pennington, Tetine Sentell, Afshin Vafaei, Saionara Maria Aires da Câmara, Emmanuelle Bélanger, Catherine M. Pirkle

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial supportPsychological resilienceDemographyGerontologyAdverse Childhood ExperiencesLogistic regressionMedicineSocioeconomic statusPsychologyEnvironmental healthPopulationMental healthPsychiatrySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) include an array of maltreatment and they have been shown to confer higher risks of early mobility loss and ultimately disablement in older ages. This study aims to identify resilience factors associated with physical function in a diverse sample of older adults (65-74 years) from the 2012 International Mobility in Aging Study (IMIAS) who reported ACEs. Methods 2002 participants were recruited from Kingston, Ontario; St. Hyacinthe, Quebec; Tirana, Albania; Manizales, Colombia; and Natal, Brazil. Economic ACEs were classified by self-report of at least one-poor childhood economic status, childhood hunger, parental unemployment-before the age of 15 years. The Short Physical Performance Battery was used to measure physical function; a score of < 8 was considered poor. Associations between hypothesized resilience factors (education, social support, expressed gender roles) and physical function were identified via bivariate analysis and logistic regression; after adjusting for sex, age, and sample site. Results Nearly half (46%) the participants reported economic ACES. High levels of education (OR 0.39; CI: 0.22-0.66) and social support from family (OR: 0.52; CI: 0.36-0.76), partners (OR: 0.47; CI: 0.29-0.74), and friends (OR: 0.59; CI: 0.38-0.92), as well as masculine (OR:0.49; CI: 0.29-0.83) and androgynous (0.48; CI: 0.30-0.77) gender roles, protected against poor physical function for those reporting childhood economic ACEs. Conclusions Despite encountering economic ACEs, those who achieved high relative levels of education, greater levels of support, as well as those characterized by masculine or androgynous gender roles, were more likely to maintain good physical performance in older ages compared to those with low education, no social support, and those classified as undifferentiated gender roles. Findings highlight critical points of intervention for those who experienced ACES. Key messages These findings imply that the associated negative physical health outcomes of ACEs can be delayed or eliminated via exposure to certain protective factors. Economic ACE exposure may be unavoidable, but there are resilience factors that could be promoted to foster the better health across the life course.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicHealth disparities and outcomesFrench-language works237,207