MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3092368103 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.716

What is the role of community fridges in the UK? An exploratory mixed methods study

2020· article· en· W3092368103 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shelina Visram, Eleanor Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood insecurityQuarter (Canadian coin)PopulationExploratory researchThematic analysisExploratory analysisPolitical scienceBusinessGeographyEnvironmental healthQualitative researchSociologyMedicineFood securityComputer scienceSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background More than one-quarter of the world's population is experiencing severe or moderate food insecurity, yet one-third of all food produced is lost or wasted. In response to this paradox, countries such as Spain, Germany and the UK have introduced community fridges: 'a public space where organisations and households can make perishable foods that would have been wasted available to the community'. The UK is home to the world's first national community fridge network, comprising 90 operational fridges that have so far redistributed 780 tonnes of surplus food. Other fridges exist outside of this network but little is known about what they do or who they serve. The objective of this study was to explore the role of community fridges in the UK. Methods A mixed methods approach was used, involving an online survey of community fridge organisers and telephone interviews with a purposively selected sample of respondents. The survey was piloted before being distributed via email and social media. Forty-seven responses were received from individuals representing 42 community fridges, and in-depth interviews were conducted with eight respondents. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Three main roles fulfilled by community fridges were identified: reducing food waste; helping those in need; and building a sense of community. Some participants were reluctant to describe their work as being linked to food insecurity, citing the potential for stigmatisation. Others indicated that their primary goal was to tackle hunger in a non-stigmatising way, by providing free access to nutritious foods. A minor theme involved creating opportunities to build community cohesion. Conclusions Community fridges may form part of efforts to reduce food waste and tackle growing levels of food insecurity in the UK. This is an area ripe further for research, given the potential to promote sharing and social cohesion but also the risks in terms of stigma, hygiene and food safety. Key messages The UK is home to the world's first national community fridge network, but little is currently known about what these fridges do or who they serve. Community fridges have a role in reducing food waste, addressing food insecurity and building community cohesion, although stigma remains a concern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.532
GPT teacher head0.536
Teacher spread0.004 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public Health→Same topicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations→French-language works237,207→