Evolutionary history of the Galápagos Rail revealed by ancient mitogenomes and modern samples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The biotas of the Galápagos Islands are probably one of the best studied island systems and have provided a broad model of insular species’ origins and evolution. Nevertheless, some Galápagos species remain poorly characterized, such as the Galápagos Rail Laterallus spilonota . This bird species is one of the less explored groups of endemic vertebrates on these islands, due to its elusive behavior, cryptic plumage and restricted distribution. To date there is no genetic assessment of its origins and sister relationships to other taxa, and importantly, there is no data on its current genetic diversity. This lack of information is critical given the adverse fate of island rail species around the world in the recent past. Here we examine the genetics of Galápagos Rails using a combination of mitogenome de novo assembly with multi-locus sequencing (mtDNA+nuDNA) from both modern and historical samples. We show that the Galápagos Rail is part of the ‘American black rail clade’, sister to Black Rail L. jamaicensis , with a colonization of Galápagos dated to 1.2 Mya. The separate analysis of cyt b , ND2, and RAG-1 markers demonstrates shallow population structure across sampled islands, possibly due to elevated island connectivity. Additionally, birds sampled from Pinta possessed the lowest levels of genetic diversity, most likely reflecting the impact of past bottlenecks due to habitat loss caused by invasive goats grazing on sensitive habitat. The data presented here highlights the low genetic diversity in this endemic rail species and suggests the use of genetic data (both modern and historical) to guide conservation efforts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".