MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092467963 · doi:10.11159/icmfht.189

Numerical Simulation of Taylor Flow in the Entrance Region ofMicrochannels

2020· article· en· W3092467963 on OpenAlexafffund
Amin Etminan, Yuri S. Muzychka, Kevin Pope

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFlow (mathematics)MechanicsMicrochannelComputer simulationComputer scienceMicrofluidicsStatistical physicsPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has been widely employed by investigators to simulate Taylor flow in microchannels. High-resolution images captured by numerical techniques reveal significant details of an ultra-thin liquid film around the gas bubble. The interface between the liquid and the gas phases is a decisive factor in order to determine the flow pattern, the gas bubble profile, the bubble length-separation distance, the slug length, and so forth. Since the thickness of the liquid film is on the order of 10-15 m for low capillary number flows, the mesh generation requires careful modeling to capture it and transport phenomena, such as momentum and heat. The present study is to develop a model of a transient Taylor flow in a two-dimensional microchannel using commercial ANSYS Fluent software. The Volume of Fluid (VoF) method was employed to simulate the interface between two phases, i.e., air and water. A comprehensive grid study was carried out to identify a sufficiently fine mesh to capture the film layer around the gas bubble in the uniform film thickness region. The curvatures of the nose and the tail of the gas bubbles were studied during traveling through the channel. Variations of the lengths of slugs and plugs were also measured as the functions of time. The numerical results were validated by available correlations of liquid film thickness, and slug length in previous studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Momentum, Heat and Mass TransferSame topicLattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207