Early relapse rate determines further relapse risk: results of a 5-year follow-up study on pediatric CFH-Ab HUS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The complement factor H antibody (CFH-Ab)-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) forms a distinct subgroup within the complement-mediated HUS disease spectrum. The autoimmune nature of this HUS subgroup implies the potential benefit of a targeted immunosuppressive therapy. Data on long-term outcome are scarce. METHODS: This observational study evaluates the clinical outcome of 19 pediatric CFH-Ab HUS patients from disease onset until their 5-year follow-up. RESULTS: All but one relapse occurred during the first 2 years, and patients who had no relapse within the first 6 months were relapse-free until the end of the observation period. Kidney function at disease onset determines long-term kidney function: all individuals with normal kidney function at disease onset had normal kidney function after 5 years, and all patients with reduced kidney function at onset had impaired kidney function at the last follow-up. Level of CFH-Ab titer at disease onset was not correlated with a higher risk of recurrences or worse long-term outcome after 5 years. Resolution of CFH-Ab titers after 5 years was common. CONCLUSIONS: CFH-Ab HUS patients have a varied overall long-term course. Early relapses are common, making close surveillance during the first years essential, regardless of the initial CFH-Ab titer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".