Multicenter study of the effectiveness of antiscar therapy in patients at different age periods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Was to evaluate the effectiveness of anti-scar treatment with Contractubex gel in children and adults. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A group of researchers based on clinical hospitals and university medical clinics carry out the multicenter study to evaluate the effectiveness of anti-scar treatment with Contractubex gel containing cepalin, allantoin and heparin, with its early appointment in groups of children from 12 to 18 years old and adults from 21 to 35 years old. The study included data from 216 patients. Patients of both age groups were initially divided into two: the main and control ones with an equal distribution according to the type of surgical intervention (hernia repair and appendectomy), age, gender, and anamnestic data. The dynamic observation was carried out using two rating scales - filled out by a doctor (Vancouver scale) and a patient (author's rating scale in the Scar Diary mobile application). RESULTS: <0.05) improvement in the main group (0,2±0,06 points) compared with the control group (0,6±0,17 points). In addition, was noticed the strong commitment to anti-scar treatment in pediatric patients. CONCLUSIONS: The work confirms the undoubted need for anti-scar treatment in the early stages of scar formation after surgical interventions, which accelerates the psychophysical rehabilitation of patients after surgery and improves the quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".