MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092529584 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.445

Healthy Eating Policy for a provincial health authority in Atlantic Canada

2020· article· en· W3092529584 on OpenAlexaffabout
Laura J. Kennedy, Tom Nicholson, Brenda MacDonald, Emily Jago, Catherine L. Mah

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health AuthorityDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological interventionGeneral partnershipCorporate governanceHealth promotionGovernment (linguistics)Promotion (chess)Political scienceBusinessMedicineEnvironmental healthPublic relationsPublic administrationPsychologyNursingPublic healthPoliticsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Issue Poor diets, the global leading cause of death and disability, are influenced by individual and community factors. Community health care settings have the potential to shape dietary behavior through food and beverage environments, and a healthy eating culture that supports the healthier choice as the easier choice. Description of the Problem The Nova Scotia Health Authority (NSHA) is a provincial government health authority in Atlantic Canada, responsible for delivering services to nearly 1 million people in 10 hospitals, 8 ERs, and 135 community locations. The NSHA employs over 23,400 health workers. In 2015, the NSHA centralized its governance, merging 9 regional health districts into one. Policies and procedures were re-written with a provincial focus, including a new Healthy Eating Policy (HEP) adopted in 2018. In this paper, we discuss the implementation of the HEP as a case study for how healthy eating can be fostered through continuous quality improvement. Results The policy upholds NSHA as a community leader working collaboratively with internal and external partners. To be a credible leader in changing the landscape around healthy eating, NSHA agrees to “walk the talk” and model an evidence-based healthy eating policy. A hospital in Halifax piloted pricing, placement and promotion interventions to further support healthier eating. These have been expanded to other sites across NS. Lessons 1) Internal Capacity Building - A Healthy Eating Steering Committee promotes healthy eating across the health system, including initiatives in partnership with auxiliaries, foundations and staff. 2) Improving Evaluation Infrastructure- The interventions led to strategic thinking of future point of sale systems and ways to improve data collection for evaluation 3) Academic Partnerships - NSHA and Dalhousie University formed a collaborative partnership to strengthen evaluation capacity making use of the latest evidence and methods from food environments research. Key messages The Nova Scotia Health Authority’s Health Eating Policy supports healthy eating across the province, and promotes supportive environments where the healthier choice is the easier choice. A hospital site in Halifax, NS, implemented a variety of pricing, placement and promotion interventions to promote a healthy workplace environment for employees and community members.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score0.876

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0230.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.001
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicObesity, Physical Activity, DietFrench-language works237,207