Niche determinants in a salamander complex: Does hybridism or reproductive parasitism explain patterns of distribution?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Organisms with multiple biotic attributes may also have conflicting niche determinants, and we assessed whether the realized niche reflects single or multiple biotic attributes. A group of all‐female salamanders found in eastern North America (unisexual salamanders; Ambystoma spp.) embody two potentially competing biotic states: hybridism and obligate reproductive parasitism. In theory, hybrids should occupy areas that are transitional to those used by parental species, parasites must live in syntopy with their hosts, and parasites that engage in ecological competition with hosts should be most successful in habitats that are moderately suitable for hosts. We built niche models for bisexual salamanders ( Ambystoma laterale and Ambystoma jeffersonianum ), as well as for unisexual Ambystoma that posses nuclear DNA from both of these species. These unisexuals are both phenotypic hybrids and obligate reproductive parasites of the bisexual species. We characterized realized niches predicted for unisexual Ambystoma via a hybrid‐framework model (e.g., using environmental predictors) and a parasite‐framework model (e.g., using host suitability predictors). Model validation using ancillary data permitted evaluation of which biotic state (hybrid vs. parasite) fit the observed patterns of occupancy. The hybrid model conformed strongly with predictions that the unisexual niche would be transitional between A. laterale and A. jeffersonianum bisexuals. Average annual temperatures and terrestrial salamander species richness (a proxy for competition) were particularly descriptive of parental niches and hybrid occupancy of transitional environments. While the parasite model behaved as expected, model validation did not fully corroborate its utility for determining patterns of occupancy. Instead, model selection revealed that the hybrid model was more descriptive of unisexual occurrence than the parasite model. Despite the fundamental importance of reproductive parasitism to the persistence of unisexual Ambystoma , we suggest that hybridism has greater contribution to the realized niche. When species have competing ecological attributes, one primary biotic state may dominate as a determinant of the realized niche.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".