Anisotropic borehole response from pressuremeter testing in deep clay shale formations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the result of five pressuremeter tests conducted in deep three clay shale formations at a thermal operation site. Pressuremeter loading was imposed parallel to the bedding plane under an approximately undrained condition. Test data are analyzed using the axisymmetric cavity expansion theory. In parallel with triaxial test results, the analyses reveal several constitutive characteristics of the Westgate clay shale, in particular, the limited nonlinearity and the stress−strain-path dependency of shear modulus. A procedure is proposed to correct the data including multi-azimuth radial displacement measurements in the caliper plane and the anisotropic response of the borehole is studied. Two aspects of azimuthal anisotropy are assessed — (i) in-plane anisotropy of borehole stiffness and (ii) the anisotropy in expansion after borehole plastic yielding. The latter provides the implication of anisotropic in situ horizontal stresses, demonstrated by both experimental and numerical evidence. The influence of the radial and azimuthal variations of the elastic stiffness around borehole on the interpreted orientation of in situ horizontal stresses is discussed. An agreement is shown between the interpreted azimuth of major or minor in situ horizontal stress and the reported crustal stress orientation for the test least affected by such stiffness variation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".