Graduate students’ mental health: Exploring experiences of isolation and loneliness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background A student psychological health survey, conducted in 2015-2016 among over 10,000 students at the University of Montreal (UdeM), gives an alarming picture of psychological distress associated to feelings of loneliness. The objective of this phenomenological study is to better understand the experience of isolation from the perspective of UdeM graduate students. Methods As part of a qualitative methods course, five semi-directed interviews and a focus group (n = 8) were conducted with graduate students and a psychologist from UdeM. Hybrid thematic analysis of verbatim and inter-rater debriefing were conducted using NVivo 11 software. Results Thematic analysis illustrates that most graduate students feel isolated at some point during their studies, but also that the impact and the meaning of this loneliness feeling is variable. It can be perceived positively when it is sought, temporary and/or allows one to be more productive. It can be perceived negatively when it is involuntary, constant over time and/or does not improve academic effectiveness. Personality, academic and social contexts, as well as support by peers and supervisors appear to modify feelings of isolation. Conclusions This study demonstrates the importance of context for graduate students' feelings of isolation. Further research is needed to move towards saturation of perspectives around this phenomenon. Key messages Graduate students reported that the experience and the repercussions of isolation may differ in whether it is sought or involuntary. Factors that seem to influence the feeling of loneliness include academic context and supervisor support. Further research is needed to discriminate the impact of these different contextual factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".