MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092629640 · doi:10.4172/1204-5357.1000377

Challenges Faced in Digital Economy Due to Consumer Behavioral Changes

2020· article· en· W3092629640 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ganesh Nair, Pooja Nuna

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital economyDatabase transactionPaymentCashConsumer behaviourMarketingMode (computer interface)EconomyBusinessEconomicsComputer scienceFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digitalization has been the need of the modern era but yet the most important fact lies in the behavioral aspect of the consumer, whether consumer is ready to accept or has acknowledged himself/herself with the digital instrument available in the economy whether in the retail or any other medium of financial transaction. The study identifies that only 2.02% of digital transaction is catered by India in the world Economy. Cashless economy is the need and has become the most vulnerable to the aspect of perception and attitude of the individuals who are still in a way of promoting liquid or cash mode of payment. This provide a major emphasis to the point supported by previous studies as well as market research done on the basis of survey method, that cashless economy is not yet prevalent within our very own nation as consumer behavior and its different components cater the major challenge for the esteemed cause and a serious initiative led by our own prime minister Narendra Modi. The money supply and demand chain have to be circulated in the economy as well as the individuals in such a way that traditional approach of consumer behavior should be transformed to the current demanding and modern digital economy. Thus, the finding of this research paper identifies the challenges of transforming or shifting the mode of payment to digitalization on the note of changes in consumer behavior and its components. This is a research based on primary data obtained by survey method on the basis of questionnaire as the key instrument over a sample size of 101 individuals and analyzed using the digital software Microsoft Excel 2019.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Internet Banking and CommerceSame topicFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital FinanceFrench-language works237,207