The Einstein and Landau‐Lifshitz pseudotensors—A mathematical note on existence
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For a closed system, the conservation of energy and momentum has been affirmed through a vast array of experiments. In an attempt to reconcile the General Theory of Relativity with these findings, Einstein constructed, ad hoc , his so-called pseudotensor [A. Einstein, Ann. Phys. 49, 769 (1916)]. Yet this solution fell outside the tensorial mathematical structure of his theory. Landau and Lifshitz also constructed, ad hoc , an even more complex pseudotensor, as a proposed improvement upon the work of Einstein [The Classical Theory of Fields (Addison-Wesley Press, Inc., Cambridge, MA, 1951)]. Their pseudotensor is symmetric, unlike that proposed by Einstein. They advance that their pseudotensor yields a conservation law which also included angular momentum. However, once again, this approach leads to a mathematical construct which is not a tensor and thereby falls outside the very mathematical structure of Einstein’s theory. Both pseudotensors, whether that advanced by Einstein or by Landau and Lifshitz, violate the rules of pure mathematics and therefore can hold no place in physics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it