MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092640896 · doi:10.20855/ijav.2020.25.31697

A New Intelligent Weak Fault Recognition Framework for Rotating Machinery

2020· article· en· W3092640896 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoli Zhao, Minping Jia, Peng Ding, Daoming She, Lin Zhu, Zheng Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCase Western Reserve University
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationFault (geology)SIGNAL (programming language)Computer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)VibrationEnergy (signal processing)Artificial intelligenceAlgorithmControl theory (sociology)EngineeringMathematicsAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The presence of strong background noises makes it a challenging task to detect weak fault characteristics in vibration signals collected from rotating machinery. Thus, a two-stage intelligent weak fault recognition framework, which includes signal enhancement and intelligent recognition, is proposed in this work. The signal enhancement is accomplished via an optimized relevant variational mode decomposition (ORVMD) algorithm. Specifically, the optimal parameters are derived by combining a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm and the novel defined relevant energy (Re) index. This optimized VMD algorithm can extract the principal components from the raw signals. Then, the enhanced vibration signals via the proposed ORVMD are converted into spectral signals and fed into an improved stacked auto-encoder (ISAE) algorithm for fault recognition. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms and fault diagnosis framework in rotating machinery fault recognition and detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Journal of Acoustics and VibrationSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207